Benchmarking Knowledge-Extraction Attack and Defense on Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a cornerstone of knowledge-intensive applications, including enterprise chatbots, healthcare assistants, and agentic memory management. However, recent studies show that knowledge-extraction attacks can recover sensitive knowledge-base content through maliciously crafted queries, raising serious concerns about intellectual property theft and privacy leakage. While prior work has explored individual attack and defense techniques, the research landscape remains fragmented, spanning heterogeneous retrieval embeddings, diverse generation models, and evaluations based on non-standardized metrics and inconsistent datasets. To address this gap, we introduce the first systematic benchmark for knowledge-extraction attacks on RAG systems. Our benchmark covers a broad spectrum of attack and defense strategies, representative retrieval embedding models, and both open- and closed-source generators, all evaluated under a unified experimental framework with standardized protocols across multiple datasets. By consolidating the experimental landscape and enabling reproducible, comparable evaluation, this benchmark provides actionable insights and a practical foundation for developing privacy-preserving RAG systems in the face of emerging knowledge extraction threats. Our code is available here.

Key Contributions

• First systematic benchmark for knowledge-extraction attacks and defenses on RAG systems, unifying previously fragmented evaluation landscapes
• Covers a broad spectrum of attack and defense strategies across heterogeneous retrieval embedding models and open-/closed-source generators
• Standardized experimental protocols across multiple datasets enabling reproducible and comparable evaluation of RAG privacy threats

🛡️ Threat Analysis

Details

Similar Papers