Partial audio deepfakes, where synthesized segments are spliced into genuine recordings, are particularly deceptive because most of the audio remains authentic. Existing detectors are supervised: they require frame-level annotations, overfit to specific synthesis pipelines, and must be retrained as new generative models emerge. We argue that this supervision is unnecessary. We hypothesize that speech foundation models implicitly encode a forensic signal: genuine speech forms smooth, slowly varying embedding trajectories, while splice boundaries introduce abrupt disruptions in frame-level transitions. Building on this, we propose TRACE (Training-free Representation-based Audio Countermeasure via Embedding dynamics), a training-free framework that detects partial audio deepfakes by analyzing the first-order dynamics of frozen speech foundation model representations without any training, labeled data, or architectural modification. We evaluate TRACE on four benchmarks that span two languages using six speech foundation models. In PartialSpoof, TRACE achieves 8.08% EER, competitive with fine-tuned supervised baselines. In LlamaPartialSpoof, the most challenging benchmark featuring LLM-driven commercial synthesis, TRACE surpasses a supervised baseline outright (24.12% vs. 24.49% EER) without any target-domain data. These results show that temporal dynamics in speech foundation models provide an effective, generalize signal for training-free audio forensics.

The rapid proliferation of AI-generated images, powered by generative adversarial networks (GANs), diffusion models, and other synthesis techniques, has raised serious concerns about misinformation, copyright violations, and digital security. However, detecting such images in a generalized and robust manner remains a major challenge due to the vast diversity of generative models and data distributions. In this work, we present \textbf{Diversity Matters}, a novel framework that emphasizes data diversity and feature domain complementarity for AI-generated image detection. The proposed method introduces a feature-domain similarity filtering mechanism that discards redundant or highly similar samples across both inter-class and intra-class distributions, ensuring a more diverse and representative training set. Furthermore, we propose a dual-branch network that combines CLIP features from the pixel domain and the frequency domain to jointly capture semantic and structural cues, leading to improved generalization against unseen generative models and adversarial conditions. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly improves cross-model and cross-dataset performance compared to existing methods. \textbf{Diversity Matters} highlights the critical role of data and feature diversity in building reliable and robust detectors against the rapidly evolving landscape of synthetic content.

The threats posed by AI-generated media, particularly deepfakes, are now raising significant challenges for multimedia forensics, misinformation detection, and biometric system resulting in erosion of public trust in the legal system, significant increase in frauds, and social engineering attacks. Although several forensic methods have been proposed, they suffer from three critical gaps: (i) use of non-standardized benchmarks with GAN- or diffusion-generated images, (ii) inconsistent training protocols (e.g., scratch, frozen, fine-tuning), and (iii) limited evaluation metrics that fail to capture generalization and explainability. These limitations hinder fair comparison, obscure true robustness, and restrict deployment in security-critical applications. This paper introduces a unified benchmarking framework for systematic evaluation of forensic methods under controlled and reproducible conditions. We benchmark ten SoTA forensic methods (scratch, frozen, and fine-tuned) and seven publicly available datasets (GAN and diffusion) to perform extensive and systematic evaluations. We evaluate performance using multiple metrics, including accuracy, average precision, ROC-AUC, error rate, and class-wise sensitivity. We also further analyze model interpretability using confidence curves and Grad-CAM heatmaps. Our evaluations demonstrate substantial variability in generalization, with certain methods exhibiting strong in-distribution performance but degraded cross-model transferability. This study aims to guide the research community toward a deeper understanding of the strengths and limitations of current forensic approaches, and to inspire the development of more robust, generalizable, and explainable solutions.

The widespread use of generative AI has shown remarkable success in producing highly realistic deepfakes, posing a serious threat to various voice biometric applications, including speaker verification, voice biometrics, audio conferencing, and criminal investigations. To counteract this, several state-of-the-art (SoTA) audio deepfake detection (ADD) methods have been proposed to identify generative AI signatures to distinguish between real and deepfake audio. However, the effectiveness of these methods is severely undermined by anti-forensic (AF) attacks that conceal generative signatures. These AF attacks span a wide range of techniques, including statistical modifications (e.g., pitch shifting, filtering, noise addition, and quantization) and optimization-based attacks (e.g., FGSM, PGD, C \& W, and DeepFool). In this paper, we investigate the SoTA ADD methods and provide a comparative analysis to highlight their effectiveness in exposing deepfake signatures, as well as their vulnerabilities under adversarial conditions. We conducted an extensive evaluation of ADD methods on five deepfake benchmark datasets using two categories: raw and spectrogram-based approaches. This comparative analysis enables a deeper understanding of the strengths and limitations of SoTA ADD methods against diverse AF attacks. It does not only highlight vulnerabilities of ADD methods, but also informs the design of more robust and generalized detectors for real-world voice biometrics. It will further guide future research in developing adaptive defense strategies that can effectively counter evolving AF techniques.

Face enhancement techniques are widely used to enhance facial appearance. However, they can inadvertently distort biometric features, leading to significant decrease in the accuracy of deepfake detectors. This study hypothesizes that these techniques, while improving perceptual quality, can degrade the performance of deepfake detectors. To investigate this, we systematically evaluate whether commonly used face enhancement methods can serve an anti-forensic role by reducing detection accuracy. We use both traditional image processing methods and advanced GAN-based enhancements to evaluate the robustness of deepfake detectors. We provide a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of these enhancement techniques, focusing on their impact on Naïve, Spatial, and Frequency-based detection methods. Furthermore, we conduct adversarial training experiments to assess whether exposure to face enhancement transformations improves model robustness. Experiments conducted on the FaceForensics++, DeepFakeDetection, and CelebDF-v2 datasets indicate that even basic enhancement filters can significantly reduce detection accuracy achieving ASR up to 64.63\%. In contrast, GAN-based techniques further exploit these vulnerabilities, achieving ASR up to 75.12\%. Our results demonstrate that face enhancement methods can effectively function as anti-forensic tools, emphasizing the need for more resilient and adaptive forensic methods.