Recent advances in generative models have amplified the risk of malicious misuse of speech synthesis technologies, enabling adversaries to impersonate target speakers and access sensitive resources. Although speech deepfake detection has progressed rapidly, most existing countermeasures lack formal robustness guarantees or fail to generalize to unseen generation techniques. We propose PV-VASM, a probabilistic framework for verifying the robustness of voice anti-spoofing models (VASMs). PV-VASM estimates the probability of misclassification under text-to-speech (TTS), voice cloning (VC), and parametric signal transformations. The approach is model-agnostic and enables robustness verification against unseen speech synthesis techniques and input perturbations. We derive a theoretical upper bound on the error probability and validate the method across diverse experimental settings, demonstrating its effectiveness as a practical robustness verification tool.

The modern generative audio models can be used by an adversary in an unlawful manner, specifically, to impersonate other people to gain access to private information. To mitigate this issue, speech deepfake detection (SDD) methods started to evolve. Unfortunately, current SDD methods generally suffer from the lack of generalization to new audio domains and generators. More than that, they lack interpretability, especially human-like reasoning that would naturally explain the attribution of a given audio to the bona fide or spoof class and provide human-perceptible cues. In this paper, we propose HIR-SDD, a novel SDD framework that combines the strengths of Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) with the chain-of-thought reasoning derived from the novel proposed human-annotated dataset. Experimental evaluation demonstrates both the effectiveness of the proposed method and its ability to provide reasonable justifications for predictions.

Large Language Models (LLMs), especially their compact efficiency-oriented variants, remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks that can elicit harmful outputs despite extensive alignment efforts. Existing adversarial prompt generation techniques often rely on manual engineering or rudimentary obfuscation, producing low-quality or incoherent text that is easily flagged by perplexity-based filters. We present an automated red-teaming framework that evolves semantically meaningful and stealthy jailbreak prompts for aligned compact LLMs. The approach employs a multi-stage evolutionary search, where candidate prompts are iteratively refined using a population-based strategy augmented with temperature-controlled variability to balance exploration and coherence preservation. This enables the systematic discovery of prompts capable of bypassing alignment safeguards while maintaining natural language fluency. We evaluate our method on benchmarks in English (In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on LLMs), and a newly curated Arabic one derived from In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on LLMs and annotated by native Arabic linguists, enabling multilingual assessment.