Machine unlearning aims to selectively remove the influence of specific training samples to satisfy privacy regulations such as the GDPR's 'Right to be Forgotten'. However, many existing methods require access to the data being removed, exposing it to membership inference attacks and potential misuse of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). We address this critical challenge by proposing Shadow Unlearning, a novel paradigm of approximate unlearning, that performs machine unlearning on anonymized forget data without exposing PII. We further propose a novel privacy-preserving framework, Neuro-Semantic Projector Unlearning (NSPU) to achieve Shadow unlearning. To evaluate our method, we compile Multi-domain Fictitious Unlearning (MuFU) forget set across five diverse domains and introduce an evaluation stack to quantify the trade-off between knowledge retention and unlearning effectiveness. Experimental results on various LLMs show that NSPU achieves superior unlearning performance, preserves model utility, and enhances user privacy. Additionally, the proposed approach is at least 10 times more computationally efficient than standard unlearning approaches. Our findings foster a new direction for privacy-aware machine unlearning that balances data protection and model fidelity.

Detecting hidden behaviors in neural networks poses a significant challenge due to minimal prior knowledge and potential adversarial obfuscation. We explore this problem by framing detection as an adversarial game between two teams: the red team trains two similar models, one trained solely on benign data and the other trained on data containing hidden harmful behavior, with the performance of both being nearly indistinguishable on the benign dataset. The blue team, with limited to no information about the harmful behaviour, tries to identify the compromised model. We experiment using CNNs and try various blue team strategies, including Gaussian noise analysis, model diffing, integrated gradients, and adversarial attacks under different levels of hints provided by the red team. Results show high accuracy for adversarial-attack-based methods (100\% correct prediction, using hints), which is very promising, whilst the other techniques yield more varied performance. During our LLM-focused rounds, we find that there are not many parallel methods that we could apply from our study with CNNs. Instead, we find that effective LLM auditing methods require some hints about the undesired distribution, which can then used in standard black-box and open-weight methods to probe the models further and reveal their misalignment. We open-source our auditing games (with the model and data) and hope that our findings contribute to designing better audits.

Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple users to collaboratively train a global model in a distributed manner without revealing their personal data. However, FL remains vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious actors inject crafted updates to compromise the global model's accuracy. We propose a novel defense mechanism, Kernel-based Trust Segmentation (KeTS), to counter model poisoning attacks. Unlike existing approaches, KeTS analyzes the evolution of each client's updates and effectively segments malicious clients using Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), even in the presence of benign outliers. We thoroughly evaluate KeTS's performance against the six most effective model poisoning attacks (i.e., Trim-Attack, Krum-Attack, Min-Max attack, Min-Sum attack, and their variants) on four different datasets (i.e., MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and KDD-CUP-1999) and compare its performance with three classical robust schemes (i.e., Krum, Trim-Mean, and Median) and a state-of-the-art defense (i.e., FLTrust). Our results show that KeTS outperforms the existing defenses in every attack setting; beating the best-performing defense by an overall average of >24% (on MNIST), >14% (on Fashion-MNIST), >9% (on CIFAR-10), >11% (on KDD-CUP-1999). A series of further experiments (varying poisoning approaches, attacker population, etc.) reveal the consistent and superior performance of KeTS under diverse conditions. KeTS is a practical solution as it satisfies all three defense objectives (i.e., fidelity, robustness, and efficiency) without imposing additional overhead on the clients. Finally, we also discuss a simple, yet effective extension to KeTS to handle consistent-untargeted (e.g., sign-flipping) attacks as well as targeted attacks (e.g., label-flipping).