AgenticRed: Optimizing Agentic Systems for Automated Red-teaming
Jiayi Yuan 1,2, Jonathan Nöther 2, Natasha Jaques 1, Goran Radanović 2
Published on arXiv
2601.13518
Prompt Injection
OWASP LLM Top 10 — LLM01
Key Finding
AgenticRed achieves 96% ASR on Llama-2-7B and 100% ASR on GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4o, outperforming prior automated red-teaming methods by up to 36%.
AgenticRed
Novel technique introduced
While recent automated red-teaming methods show promise for systematically exposing model vulnerabilities, most existing approaches rely on human-specified workflows. This dependence on manually designed workflows suffers from human biases and makes exploring the broader design space expensive. We introduce AgenticRed, an automated pipeline that leverages LLMs' in-context learning to iteratively design and refine red-teaming systems without human intervention. Rather than optimizing attacker policies within predefined structures, AgenticRed treats red-teaming as a system design problem. Inspired by methods like Meta Agent Search, we develop a novel procedure for evolving agentic systems using evolutionary selection, and apply it to the problem of automatic red-teaming. Red-teaming systems designed by AgenticRed consistently outperform state-of-the-art approaches, achieving 96% attack success rate (ASR) on Llama-2-7B (36% improvement) and 98% on Llama-3-8B on HarmBench. Our approach exhibits strong transferability to proprietary models, achieving 100% ASR on GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4o, and 60% on Claude-Sonnet-3.5 (24% improvement). This work highlights automated system design as a powerful paradigm for AI safety evaluation that can keep pace with rapidly evolving models.
Key Contributions
- AgenticRed: an automated pipeline that treats red-teaming as a system design problem, using LLM in-context learning to iteratively discover and refine attack workflows without human intervention
- A novel evolutionary selection procedure adapted from Meta Agent Search to evolve agentic red-teaming systems across generations
- Achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates — 96% on Llama-2-7B (+36%), 100% on GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4o, 60% on Claude-Sonnet-3.5 (+24%) on HarmBench