Beyond Data Filtering: Knowledge Localization for Capability Removal in LLMs
Igor Shilov 1,2, Alex Cloud 3, Aryo Pradipta Gema 1,4, Jacob Goldman-Wetzler 3, Nina Panickssery 3, Henry Sleight 5, Erik Jones 3, Cem Anil 3
Published on arXiv
2512.05648
Prompt Injection
OWASP LLM Top 10 — LLM01
Key Finding
SGTM requires seven times more fine-tuning steps for an adversary to recover removed dangerous capabilities compared to RMU, while achieving better retain/forget trade-offs under realistic label noise conditions
SGTM (Selective GradienT Masking)
Novel technique introduced
Large Language Models increasingly possess capabilities that carry dual-use risks. While data filtering has emerged as a pretraining-time mitigation, it faces significant challenges: labeling whether data is harmful is expensive at scale, and given improving sample efficiency with larger models, even small amounts of mislabeled content could give rise to dangerous capabilities. To address risks associated with mislabeled harmful content, prior work proposed Gradient Routing (Cloud et al., 2024) -- a technique that localizes target knowledge into a dedicated subset of model parameters so they can later be removed. We explore an improved variant of Gradient Routing, which we call Selective GradienT Masking (SGTM), with particular focus on evaluating its robustness to label noise. SGTM zero-masks selected gradients such that target domain examples only update their dedicated parameters. We test SGTM's effectiveness in two applications: removing knowledge of one language from a model trained on a bilingual synthetic dataset, and removing biology knowledge from a model trained on English Wikipedia. In both cases SGTM provides better retain/forget trade-off in the presence of labeling errors compared to both data filtering and a previously proposed instantiation of Gradient Routing. Unlike shallow unlearning approaches that can be quickly undone through fine-tuning, SGTM exhibits strong robustness to adversarial fine-tuning, requiring seven times more fine-tuning steps to reach baseline performance on the forget set compared to a finetuning-based unlearning method (RMU). Our results suggest SGTM provides a promising pretraining-time complement to existing safety mitigations, particularly in settings where label noise is unavoidable.
Key Contributions
- SGTM (Selective GradienT Masking): zero-masks selected gradients during pretraining so target-domain examples update only dedicated parameters, enabling clean capability removal by ablating those parameters
- Demonstrates superior retain/forget trade-off under label noise compared to data filtering and prior Gradient Routing across language removal and biology knowledge removal tasks
- Shows SGTM requires 7x more adversarial fine-tuning steps to recover removed capabilities versus the RMU baseline unlearning method