Rethinking Reasoning: A Survey on Reasoning-based Backdoors in LLMs

With the rise of advanced reasoning capabilities, large language models (LLMs) are receiving increasing attention. However, although reasoning improves LLMs' performance on downstream tasks, it also introduces new security risks, as adversaries can exploit these capabilities to conduct backdoor attacks. Existing surveys on backdoor attacks and reasoning security offer comprehensive overviews but lack in-depth analysis of backdoor attacks and defenses targeting LLMs' reasoning abilities. In this paper, we take the first step toward providing a comprehensive review of reasoning-based backdoor attacks in LLMs by analyzing their underlying mechanisms, methodological frameworks, and unresolved challenges. Specifically, we introduce a new taxonomy that offers a unified perspective for summarizing existing approaches, categorizing reasoning-based backdoor attacks into associative, passive, and active. We also present defense strategies against such attacks and discuss current challenges alongside potential directions for future research. This work offers a novel perspective, paving the way for further exploration of secure and trustworthy LLM communities.

Key Contributions

• First comprehensive survey dedicated to reasoning-based backdoor attacks in LLMs, covering mechanisms, methodological frameworks, and unresolved challenges
• Novel cognition-centric taxonomy categorizing reasoning-based backdoor attacks into three types: associative, passive, and active
• Review of defense strategies against reasoning-based backdoor attacks and discussion of future research directions

🛡️ Threat Analysis

Details

Similar Papers