Jiaming Liang

Transformation-based adversarial attacks (TAAs) demonstrate strong transferability when deceiving classification models. However, existing TAAs often perform unsatisfactorily or even fail when applied to structured tasks such as semantic segmentation and object detection. Encouragingly, recent studies that categorize transformations into non-spatial and spatial transformations inspire us to address this challenge. We find that for non-structured tasks, labels are spatially non-structured, and thus TAAs are not required to adjust labels when applying spatial transformations. In contrast, for structured tasks, labels are spatially structured, and failing to transform labels synchronously with inputs can cause spatial misalignment and yield erroneous gradients. To address these issues, we propose a novel unified Spatial Alignment Framework (SAF) for highly transferable TAAs on spatially structured tasks, where the TAAs spatially transform labels synchronously with the input using the proposed Spatial Alignment (SA) algorithm. Extensive experiments demonstrate the crucial role of our SAF for TAAs on structured tasks. Specifically, in non-targeted attacks, our SAF degrades the average mIoU on Cityscapes from 24.50 to 11.34, and on Kvasir-SEG from 49.91 to 31.80, while reducing the average mAP of COCO from 17.89 to 5.25.

Despite their great success, deep neural networks rely on high-dimensional, non-robust representations, making them vulnerable to imperceptible perturbations, even in transfer scenarios. To address this, both training-time defenses (e.g., adversarial training and robust architecture design) and post-attack defenses (e.g., input purification and adversarial detection) have been extensively studied. Recently, a limited body of work has preliminarily explored a pre-attack defense paradigm, termed preemptive robustification, which introduces subtle modifications to benign samples prior to attack to proactively resist adversarial perturbations. Unfortunately, their practical applicability remains questionable due to several limitations, including (1) reliance on well-trained classifiers as surrogates to provide robustness priors, (2) substantial computational overhead arising from iterative optimization or trained generators for robustification, and (3) limited interpretability of the optimization- or generation-based robustification processes. Inspired by recent studies revealing a positive correlation between texture intensity and the robustness of benign samples, we show that image sharpening alone can efficiently robustify images. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first surrogate-free, optimization-free, generator-free, and human-interpretable robustification approach. Extensive experiments demonstrate that sharpening yields remarkable robustness gains with low computational cost, especially in transfer scenarios.