Kun Wang

Vision-language models remain susceptible to multimodal jailbreaks and over-refusal because safety hinges on both visual evidence and user intent, while many alignment pipelines supervise only the final response. To address this, we present SaFeR-ToolKit, which formalizes safety decision-making as a checkable protocol. Concretely, a planner specifies a persona, a Perception $\to$ Reasoning $\to$ Decision tool set, and a constrained transition graph, while a responder outputs a typed key-value tool trace before the final answer. To make the protocol reliably followed in practice, we train a single policy with a three-stage curriculum (SFT $\to$ DPO $\to$ GRPO), where GRPO directly supervises tool usage beyond answer-level feedback. Our contributions are two-fold: I. Dataset. The first tool-based safety reasoning dataset, comprising 31,654 examples (SFT 6k, DPO 18.6k, GRPO 6k) plus 1k held-out evaluation. II. Experiments. On Qwen2.5-VL, SaFeR-ToolKit significantly improves Safety/Helpfulness/Reasoning Rigor on 3B (29.39/45.04/4.98 $\to$ 84.40/71.13/78.87) and 7B (53.21/52.92/19.26 $\to$ 86.34/80.79/85.34), while preserving general capabilities (3B: 58.67 $\to$ 59.21; 7B: 66.39 $\to$ 66.81). Codes are available at https://github.com/Duebassx/SaFeR_ToolKit.

As Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) emerge as powerful tools for speech processing, their safety implications demand urgent attention. While considerable research has explored textual and vision safety, audio's distinct characteristics present significant challenges. This paper first investigates: Is ALLM vulnerable to backdoor attacks exploiting acoustic triggers? In response to this issue, we introduce Hidden in the Noise (HIN), a novel backdoor attack framework designed to exploit subtle, audio-specific features. HIN applies acoustic modifications to raw audio waveforms, such as alterations to temporal dynamics and strategic injection of spectrally tailored noise. These changes introduce consistent patterns that an ALLM's acoustic feature encoder captures, embedding robust triggers within the audio stream. To evaluate ALLM robustness against audio-feature-based triggers, we develop the AudioSafe benchmark, assessing nine distinct risk types. Extensive experiments on AudioSafe and three established safety datasets reveal critical vulnerabilities in existing ALLMs: (I) audio features like environment noise and speech rate variations achieve over 90% average attack success rate. (II) ALLMs exhibit significant sensitivity differences across acoustic features, particularly showing minimal response to volume as a trigger, and (III) poisoned sample inclusion causes only marginal loss curve fluctuations, highlighting the attack's stealth.