Amitava Das

Large Language Models (LLMs) fine-tuned to align with human values often exhibit alignment drift, producing unsafe or policy-violating completions when exposed to adversarial prompts, decoding perturbations, or paraphrased jailbreaks. While prior work has behaviorally characterized alignment failure, little is known about the training-time belief sources underlying these failures. We introduce TraceAlign, a unified framework for tracing unsafe completions back to their root causes in the model's training corpus. Central to our approach is the Belief Conflict Index (BCI), which quantifies semantic inconsistency between generated spans and aligned policies, based on retrieved training documents using suffix-array matching. We propose three complementary interventions: (i) TraceShield, an inference-time safety filter that refuses completions with high-BCI spans, (ii) Contrastive Belief Deconfliction Loss, a contrastive fine-tuning objective penalizing high-BCI continuations during DPO, and (iii) Prov-Decode, a provenance-aware decoding strategy that vetoes beam expansions predicted to yield high-BCI spans. Together, these defenses reduce alignment drift by up to 85% on our curated Alignment Drift Benchmark (ADB) while preserving utility on standard tasks, with delta less than 0.2 and improved refusal quality. We further derive a theoretical upper bound on drift likelihood via suffix-array span statistics, linking memorization frequency and length to adversarial reactivation risk. TraceAlign thus provides the first scalable, traceable, and grounded toolkit for understanding and mitigating alignment failures at source. To encourage further exploration and development, we open-source our implementation at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/tracealign-2DA7

Aligned large language models(LLMs) remain vulnerable to adversarial manipulation, and their dependence on web-scale pretraining creates a subtle but serious attack surface. We study Stealth Pretraining Seeding (SPS), a new attack family in which adversaries distribute small amounts of poisoned content across stealth websites, expose them to web crawlers through robots.txt, and thereby increase the likelihood that such content is absorbed into future training corpora derived from sources such as Common Crawl. Because each individual payload is tiny, diffuse, and superficially benign, the attack is difficult to detect during dataset construction or filtering. The result is a latent form of poisoning: dormant logic landmines embedded during pretraining that remain largely invisible under standard evaluation, yet can later be activated by precise alphanumeric triggers such as <00TRIGGER00> to bypass safeguards. We call this attack PermaFrost, by analogy to Arctic permafrost: harmful material can remain frozen, buried, and unnoticed for long periods, only to resurface when conditions allow. We operationalize this threat through PermaFrost-Attack, a controlled framework for latent conceptual poisoning, together with a suite of geometric diagnostics: Thermodynamic Length, Spectral Curvature, and the Infection Traceback Graph. Across multiple model families and scales, we show that SPS is broadly effective, inducing persistent unsafe behavior while often evading alignment defenses. Our results identify SPS as a practical and underappreciated threat to future foundation models. This paper introduces a novel geometric diagnostic lens for systematically examining latent model behavior, providing a principled foundation for detecting, characterizing, and understanding vulnerabilities that may remain invisible to standard evaluation.