Xiao Wang

To preserve user privacy in recommender systems, federated recommendation (FR) based on federated learning (FL) emerges, keeping the personal data on the local client and updating a model collaboratively. Unlike FL, FR has a unique sparse aggregation mechanism, where the embedding of each item is updated by only partial clients, instead of full clients in a dense aggregation of general FL. Recently, as an essential principle of FL, model security has received increasing attention, especially for Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients can send arbitrary updates. The problem of exploring the Byzantine robustness of FR is particularly critical since in the domains applying FR, e.g., e-commerce, malicious clients can be injected easily by registering new accounts. However, existing Byzantine works neglect the unique sparse aggregation of FR, making them unsuitable for our problem. Thus, we make the first effort to investigate Byzantine attacks on FR from the perspective of sparse aggregation, which is non-trivial: it is not clear how to define Byzantine robustness under sparse aggregations and design Byzantine attacks under limited knowledge/capability. In this paper, we reformulate the Byzantine robustness under sparse aggregation by defining the aggregation for a single item as the smallest execution unit. Then we propose a family of effective attack strategies, named Spattack, which exploit the vulnerability in sparse aggregation and are categorized along the adversary's knowledge and capability. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that Spattack can effectively prevent convergence and even break down defenses under a few malicious clients, raising alarms for securing FR systems.

Text-attributed graphs (TAGs) enhance graph learning by integrating rich textual semantics and topological context for each node. While boosting expressiveness, they also expose new vulnerabilities in graph learning through text-based adversarial surfaces. Recent advances leverage diverse backbones, such as graph neural networks (GNNs) and pre-trained language models (PLMs), to capture both structural and textual information in TAGs. This diversity raises a key question: How can we design universal adversarial attacks that generalize across architectures to assess the security of TAG models? The challenge arises from the stark contrast in how different backbones-GNNs and PLMs-perceive and encode graph patterns, coupled with the fact that many PLMs are only accessible via APIs, limiting attacks to black-box settings. To address this, we propose BadGraph, a novel attack framework that deeply elicits large language models (LLMs) understanding of general graph knowledge to jointly perturb both node topology and textual semantics. Specifically, we design a target influencer retrieval module that leverages graph priors to construct cross-modally aligned attack shortcuts, thereby enabling efficient LLM-based perturbation reasoning. Experiments show that BadGraph achieves universal and effective attacks across GNN- and LLM-based reasoners, with up to a 76.3% performance drop, while theoretical and empirical analyses confirm its stealthy yet interpretable nature.