defense arXiv Sep 5, 2025 · Sep 2025
Walid El Maouaki, Nouhaila Innan, Alberto Marchisio et al. · Hassan II University of Casablanca · New York University Abu Dhabi +1 more
Defends quantum federated learning against adversarial examples via selective adversarial training with tunable client coverage and perturbation schedules
Input Manipulation Attack federated-learning
Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) merges privacy-preserving federation with quantum computing gains, yet its resilience to adversarial noise is unknown. We first show that QFL is as fragile as centralized quantum learning. We propose Robust Quantum Federated Learning (RobQFL), embedding adversarial training directly into the federated loop. RobQFL exposes tunable axes: client coverage $γ$ (0-100\%), perturbation scheduling (fixed-$\varepsilon$ vs $\varepsilon$-mixes), and optimization (fine-tune vs scratch), and distils the resulting $γ\times \varepsilon$ surface into two metrics: Accuracy-Robustness Area and Robustness Volume. On 15-client simulations with MNIST and Fashion-MNIST, IID and Non-IID conditions, training only 20-50\% clients adversarially boosts $\varepsilon \leq 0.1$ accuracy $\sim$15 pp at $< 2$ pp clean-accuracy cost; fine-tuning adds 3-5 pp. With $\geq$75\% coverage, a moderate $\varepsilon$-mix is optimal, while high-$\varepsilon$ schedules help only at 100\% coverage. Label-sorted non-IID splits halve robustness, underscoring data heterogeneity as a dominant risk.
federated traditional_ml Hassan II University of Casablanca · New York University Abu Dhabi · NYUAD Research Institute
ML Security Papers