Muhammad Umar Farooq

Partial audio deepfakes, where synthesized segments are spliced into genuine recordings, are particularly deceptive because most of the audio remains authentic. Existing detectors are supervised: they require frame-level annotations, overfit to specific synthesis pipelines, and must be retrained as new generative models emerge. We argue that this supervision is unnecessary. We hypothesize that speech foundation models implicitly encode a forensic signal: genuine speech forms smooth, slowly varying embedding trajectories, while splice boundaries introduce abrupt disruptions in frame-level transitions. Building on this, we propose TRACE (Training-free Representation-based Audio Countermeasure via Embedding dynamics), a training-free framework that detects partial audio deepfakes by analyzing the first-order dynamics of frozen speech foundation model representations without any training, labeled data, or architectural modification. We evaluate TRACE on four benchmarks that span two languages using six speech foundation models. In PartialSpoof, TRACE achieves 8.08% EER, competitive with fine-tuned supervised baselines. In LlamaPartialSpoof, the most challenging benchmark featuring LLM-driven commercial synthesis, TRACE surpasses a supervised baseline outright (24.12% vs. 24.49% EER) without any target-domain data. These results show that temporal dynamics in speech foundation models provide an effective, generalize signal for training-free audio forensics.

The widespread use of generative AI has shown remarkable success in producing highly realistic deepfakes, posing a serious threat to various voice biometric applications, including speaker verification, voice biometrics, audio conferencing, and criminal investigations. To counteract this, several state-of-the-art (SoTA) audio deepfake detection (ADD) methods have been proposed to identify generative AI signatures to distinguish between real and deepfake audio. However, the effectiveness of these methods is severely undermined by anti-forensic (AF) attacks that conceal generative signatures. These AF attacks span a wide range of techniques, including statistical modifications (e.g., pitch shifting, filtering, noise addition, and quantization) and optimization-based attacks (e.g., FGSM, PGD, C \& W, and DeepFool). In this paper, we investigate the SoTA ADD methods and provide a comparative analysis to highlight their effectiveness in exposing deepfake signatures, as well as their vulnerabilities under adversarial conditions. We conducted an extensive evaluation of ADD methods on five deepfake benchmark datasets using two categories: raw and spectrogram-based approaches. This comparative analysis enables a deeper understanding of the strengths and limitations of SoTA ADD methods against diverse AF attacks. It does not only highlight vulnerabilities of ADD methods, but also informs the design of more robust and generalized detectors for real-world voice biometrics. It will further guide future research in developing adaptive defense strategies that can effectively counter evolving AF techniques.